FDX1
multicom
FDX1
full_length
FDX1
Results of Structure Prediction for Target Name: FDX1 ( Click 
)
Domain Boundary prediction ( View )
>FDX1: 1-126
| 1-60: |
M | A | M | A | M | R | S | T | F | A | A | R | V | G | A | K | P | A | V | R | G | A | R | P | A | S | R | M | S | C | M | A | Y | K | V | T | L | K | T | P | S | G | D | K | T | I | E | C | P | A | D | T | Y | I | L | D | A | A | E | E |
| 61-119: |
A | G | L | D | L | P | Y | S | C | R | A | G | A | C | S | S | C | A | G | K | V | A | A | G | T | V | D | Q | S | D | Q | S | F | L | D | D | A | Q | M | G | N | G | F | V | L | T | C | V | A | Y | P | T | S | D | C | T | I | Q | T | H |
| 121-126: |
Q | E | E | A | L | Y |
| 1-60: |
C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | C | H | H | H | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 61-119: |
C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | E | E | C | C | E | E | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | H | H | H | H | H | C | C | E | E | E | H | H | H | C | E | E | C | C | C | E | E | E | E | C | C |
| 121-126: |
C | H | H | H | C | C |
|
| | H(Helix): 31(24.6%) | E(Strand): 32(25.4%) | C(Coil): 63(50%) |
| 1-60: |
E | E | E | B | E | E | B | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | E | B | B | E | E |
| 61-119: |
E | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | E | B | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | E | B | E | E | E | B | B | B | B | B | E |
| 121-126: |
B | E | E | E | B | E |
|
| | e(Exposed): 79(62.7%) | b(Buried): 47(37.3%) |
| 1-60: |
T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 61-119: |
N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 121-126: |
N | T | T | T | T | T |
|
| | N(Normal): 96(76.19%) | T(Disorder): 30(23.81%) |
Predicted contact map and distance map
|
Predicted distance map
Note: No long-range contacts in the model!
|
|
Predicted contact map
Note: No long-range contacts in the model!
|
Probability to Precision
Note: The linear model (Average probability vs Predicted precision) was trained on CASP14 dataset
|
Predicted Top 1 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
88.00 |
| TopL/2 |
92.06 |
| TopL |
76.98 |
| Top2L |
45.63 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
29013 |
| Neff |
3142 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 2 |
0.6989 |
| Model 3 |
0.8183 |
| Model 4 |
0.7227 |
| Model 5 |
0.8084 |
| Average |
0.76208 |
Radius Gyration
|
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 2 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
88.00 |
| TopL/2 |
90.48 |
| TopL |
70.63 |
| Top2L |
43.65 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
29013 |
| Neff |
3142 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.6989 |
| Model 3 |
0.6858 |
| Model 4 |
0.7229 |
| Model 5 |
0.6901 |
| Average |
0.69943 |
Radius Gyration
|
|
|
Predicted Top 3 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
88.00 |
| TopL/2 |
92.06 |
| TopL |
77.78 |
| Top2L |
45.63 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
29013 |
| Neff |
3142 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8183 |
| Model 2 |
0.6858 |
| Model 4 |
0.7174 |
| Model 5 |
0.8349 |
| Average |
0.76410 |
Radius Gyration
|
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
Predicted Top 4 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
88.00 |
| TopL/2 |
87.30 |
| TopL |
70.63 |
| Top2L |
42.86 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
29013 |
| Neff |
3142 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.7227 |
| Model 2 |
0.7229 |
| Model 3 |
0.7174 |
| Model 5 |
0.7365 |
| Average |
0.72488 |
Radius Gyration
|
|
|
Predicted Top 5 Tertiary structure
|
|
|
| Long-Range |
Precision |
| TopL/5 |
88.00 |
| TopL/2 |
93.65 |
| TopL |
78.57 |
| Top2L |
44.84 |
| Alignment |
Number |
| N |
29013 |
| Neff |
3142 |
|
Model comparsion
| Model |
TM-score |
| Model 1 |
0.8084 |
| Model 2 |
0.6901 |
| Model 3 |
0.8349 |
| Model 4 |
0.7365 |
| Average |
0.76748 |
Radius Gyration
|
|
Note: The model is built by ab initio method, no significant templates are found!
|
References
[1] Hou, J., Wu, T., Cao, R., & Cheng, J. (2019). Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13. bioRxiv, 552422.
[2] Li, J., Deng, X., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2013). Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system. BMC structural biology, 13(1), 2.
[3] Cheng, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Deng, X. (2012). The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics, 13(1), 65.
[4] Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., & Cheng, J. (2010). MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26(7), 882-888.
